Obama Bolsters U.S. Hybrid Automobile Sales in Waning Consumer Market – Bloomberg. There are several sound reasons why consumers are not buying hybrids:
Ford Fusion Hybrid
Obama Bolsters U.S. Hybrid Automobile Sales in Waning Consumer Market – Bloomberg. There are several sound reasons why consumers are not buying hybrids:
Ford Fusion Hybrid
Why does the Obama administration hate cars? Is this antagonism toward personal vehicles just another attempt to turn America into Europe, where tiny cars clog tiny streets, and gasoline costs much more than it does in the U.S.? Or is it a case of “smart cars for thee, but not for me”, where only the ruling class will get to keep their motorcades of a dozen armor-plated Chevrolet Suburbans?
Last month, the EPA proposed a change to the decades-old fuel mileage stickers found on all new cars. One of the ideas being subjected to public comment is a rating statement which gives actual letter grades to various types of cars, based on their estimated MPG and also their exhaust emissions. Pure electric cars would get an “A” grade, while hybrids or flex fuel vehicles would get a “B”. Full-size SUV’s and high-horsepower performance cars get a “D”.
While it is very nice of the government to offer helpful suggestions of what type of car is best to buy, the car-shopping public has already voted with its wallet. The gargantuan Ford Expedition and luxurious Lincoln Navigator saw huge sales increases in an otherwise dismal August auto sales report (WardAuto.com, September 1, 2010). Also, the top two best-selling vehicles in America continued to be full-size pickup trucks from Ford and Chevrolet (The Wall Street Journal, September 22, 2010).
Meanwhile, on the hypocrite front, word came from Detroit that the Reverend Jesse Jackson had his super-sized Cadillac Escalade stolen and stripped- while he was attending a green jobs seminar! As someone once said, you can’t make this stuff up. It’s just like when Al Gore has to cancel a global warming speech due to a snowstorm.
Finally, we learned from Obama’s erstwhile car czar Steven Rattner that the President, frustrated with the effort to bailout GM and Chrysler (and the UAW), allegedly said, “why can’t they just make a Corolla?” Um, Mr. President, GM did build a Corolla- it was called the Chevrolet Nova in the 1980’s, and it was built at the NUMMI plant in Fremont, California. The plant was a joint venture between GM and Toyota that operated for over 20 years, until first GM and then Toyota pulled out this year.
There are many reasons why “they” can’t build a small car to compete with Toyota, Honda, Hyundai, and others. Inflated union wages are one, but mostly, it is over-regulation of the marketplace that prevents U.S. manufacturers from profitably building and selling subcompacts. One would think that the head of the most “progressive” (regulation-happy) administration in history would know about that, and thus would not have to ask the question.
Kyle Busch, Looking For a Friend, Crashes Todd Bodines Victory Lane Party | Bleacher Report.
Please follow the link to my latest NASCAR coulmn on BleacherReport.com.
Boris Said Beats “Mad Max” Papis In Thrilling Nationwide Finish | Bleacher Report.
Please follow the link to my latest NASCAR article on BleacherReport.com.
Love Him Or Hate Him, Kyle Busch Owns Bristol | Bleacher Report.
Please follow the link to my latest NASCAR column at BleacherReport.com
In sign of good times Ford to pay Bill Ford again « Birth Of The Republic.
Great news for Bill Ford and Ford Motor Company. Somehow, the Obama Administration is trying to take credit for the revival of Ford, even though Ford needed no government assistance to return to profitability.
I spotted this car on the highway on Saturday and bought it as a “project” for me and our 3 youngest sons. It is a 1993 Chevrolet Lumina 3.1 Euro Coupe, the sporty version of Chevy’s mid-size car from the ’90s. The young guys that I bought it from said they rebuilt the engine, but they didn’t get it exactly right. It won’t idle, and it must have a coolant leak because the low coolant light stays on, even though it does not run hot, and I filled up the reservoir.
They were asking $1,199,so I offered $800 and we agreed on $920. It has 167,000 miles, but the body is in good shape with few dents, and the paint is decent. I went almost immediately to Budget Brakes and had new front rotors, pads, and a hose installed.
Today, we washed it and cleaned the upholstery. It has cleaned up pretty well, but still needs more mechanical work. I will go tomorrow to get the tags for it, and soon I am going to put it in the shop at Free Serivce Tire and have Mike Freeman’s technicians inspect it and diagnose the engine issues.
We went to Advance Auto Parts and bought some cleaners and air fresheners, STP Fuel Treatment, and a license plate bracket. Ryan wanted to put the license plate on it that was on our Buick when it was wrecked. Ryan was driving himself, Dale and Sean home from school last September when he ran the Skylark off a rain-slick road into a tree and a fence. The Buick was totalled, and Dale took an ambulance ride to U.T. Trauma Center due to a concussion. Ironically, that license plate is an old Dale Earnhardt collectible, which has on it- a Chevy Lumina!
I am going to blog the restoration (such as it is) of the Lumina here, with updates periodically. Here are the details so far:
Let me state upfront that I am no big fan of Toyota. To quote Mike Dushane of Car and Driver, ” Toyota has earned a reputation in this country over the past 30 years as a maker of utterly dull and utterly reliable transportation appliances.” I drive a 1996 GMC Suburban, the anti-Prius if there ever was one. Having said that, I now intend to defend Toyota based on common sense and some automotive history. 
In the 1960′s Ralph Nader published Unsafe at Any Speed, his opus of bile against the American automobile industry. The centerpiece of the book was Nader’s criticism of the Chevrolet Corvair, General Motor’s attempt to capitalize on the unexpected popularity of the Volkswagen Beetle. Nader asserted that the rear engined, swing-axle suspension design of the Corvair made it inherently unstable in cornering situations. Nader made a critical error that would be repeated by other automotive safety critics, the media, and the U.S. government at least two more times in the next 30 odd years.
What Ralph Nader neglected to mention is that most Corvair buyers had no previous experience driving rear engined cars. The handling characteristics are quite different from the larger, front engine/rear wheel drive cars Americans were used to. The Corvair, as well as the contemporary Beetle, tended to over-steer, that is, the rear end of the car would come around if cornering at too high speeds. Compounding this quirk was the swing axle suspension, which allowed the inside rear wheel to “jack up” in a corner, increasing the chance of a rollover.
Drivers experienced with oversteer conditions knew to overcome them by careful steering correction. American drivers, lacking this knowledge, ended up rolling their Corvairs over or running them off the road. It probably didn’t help that the small Corvair had to share the road with the two-and-a-half ton land yachts of the time. Naturally, as today, the smaller car fared much worse in a collision with a larger one. Thus did General Motors end up with a reputation for selling a deathtrap, and Ralph Nader established himself as America’s first car nanny.
Fast forward to the 1980′s, and the origin of today’s “sudden acceleration” hysteria. Audi was beginning to establish itself in America as a maker of high performance German luxury cars. There were some incidents of Audi 5000 models seeming to take on minds of their own, accelerating when their drivers were trying to brake. CBS-TV’s 60 Minutes broadcast a horribly biased account of these events, using a plaintiff’s attorney’s consultant as their resident expert. After numerous lawsuits, the US government determined that “every single so-called unintended acceleration accident was caused by driver error.” Again, most American drivers of Audis were used to the brake and accelerator pedals being farther apart, as they had traded their Buicks and Lincolns for the latest in high-end autos.
This brings us to the current day, and the media and government feeding frenzy against Toyota. The most highly publicized incident so far, the deaths of 4 people in a Lexus in California, has been found to have been caused by an incorrect floor mat causing the accelerator to stick wide open. Likewise, the recent incredible story of the runaway Prius is full of holes big enough to drive an F-150 through. All car manufacturers have had cases of unintended acceleration reported to them. The reason Toyota gets more attention is that there are more Toyotas on the road, and, especially in the case of the Prius, most drivers are unaccustomed to newer technology such as hybrid powerplants and electronic,”drive-by-wire” throttles.
In spite of Nader’s assertions and those that have followed him, automakers do not build cars to kill their customers. That would be bad for business. There are many good articles available on the web explaining what to do if your car suddenly accelerates on its own. Please read them if you think you will ever be in that situation. I have driven for more than 35 years, and it hasn’t happened to me yet. Read these reports of runaway Toyotas (and other makes) with a grain of salt, and apply some common sense.
http://www.caranddriver.com/features/09q4/how_to_deal_with_unintended_acceleration-tech_dept
Ads Plugin created by Jake Ruston - Sponsored by Best GPT Site.